In the phones that I have currently available (Google, Sony, Samsung), all the Google applications can be disabled. Whether it is disabled or not, depends on the phone vendor. So lots of small free- and shareware apps which people loved were abandoned, undoing part of the Windows platform's greatest advantage: its large library of existing applications. #Ultracopier for linux debian not showing up upgrade#Worse, if you were a small indie developer, releasing an upgrade now pretty much required buying an expensive certificate to sign it, lest UAC keep warning your users that they were launching an untrusted file from the scary internet. None of this was terribly hard to fix if the application was still supported, but it did require the user to upgrade, often at a cost. Would it really have been so terrible to leave the old directory alone and call the new one "Program Files (圆4)"? #Ultracopier for linux debian not showing up 64 Bit#You got extra loser points if you went for the shiny new 64 bit version, in which case your legacy 32 bit application installer was more than likely to try its luck with "Program Files" instead of "Program Files (x86)". #Ultracopier for linux debian not showing up install#So new Vista owners would click through a bunch of obnoxious UAC popups to install their favorite Windows applications, click through more UAC popups to launch them, and then watch them crash or mysteriously lose all their data. This worked fine on Windows 9x, which by default allows user-owned processes to do just about anything, but not on NT, where writing to Program Files requires elevation. Lots of legacy applications broke for the most trivial of reasons: they were written to store configuration and other data in their installation directory, which defaulted to "C:\Program Files". Just about any application you cared to launch required permission dialogs to be clicked through - irritating to everybody, scary to most users, and quickly ineffective as everybody stopped reading and just reflexively went for the OK button. As others have pointed out, UAC was way too active. I built a new PC in 2007, bought Vista Ultimate OEM, installed it and added all patches up to that point. But that was all that was needed for Vista to be seen as a disaster and Windows 7 an unparalleled success. #Ultracopier for linux debian not showing up drivers#But the regular user wants to use the computer right away after boot and will only remember the agonizing slowness of trying to start the browser and office applications after boot.Ĭompared to Vista, Windows 7 was just a new (much better) taskbar, better tuned prefetch and with the very important difference that by the time Windows 7 arrived the drivers had matured and many of them even supported 64 bit systems. If you seldom rebooted you never had to worry about it. If doing one task takes 1s, doing two tasks each taking 1s will now take 9 seconds if run in parallel etc.Īfter enough time this wasn't a problem as all your freely available RAM had been used up by prefetch or actual programs. Yes they were supposed to be run with low priority but it really exposed how bad spinning harddrives are at multitasking. It meant that the first 10 minutes after boot was spent trying to speed up that you might want to do at the extreme cost of slowing down things you actually wanted to do. If you had a decent amount of RAM on launch day, or just a new regular computer 6 months after launch, the pre-fetching algorithms were so aggressive that they completely overloaded the harddrives that perform terrible with that random access load. Pre-fetch/super-fetch or whatever they called it was WAY to aggressive. #Ultracopier for linux debian not showing up driver#Unfortunately the driver situation made things rather different between the 32 bit and 64 bit versions of windows, this did not help.Ģ. Yes there were major architectural changes but this was the perfect opportunity since it was the first MS (consumer) mainstream 64 bit OS (I don't count the 64 bit version XP). And no printer or scanner company had probably written a device driver in a decade now so it took another 5 years for them to catch up (and they just continued creating bloat ever since). nVidia alone (which only has niche hardware) themselves stood for the majority of Vista BSODs. It exposed how terrible device manufacturers are at writing drivers. I see two reasons for why it has such a bad reputation.ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |